Does Labor Legislation Benefit Workers? Well-Being after an Hours Reduction
نویسندگان
چکیده
Does Labor Legislation Benefit Workers? Well-Being after an Hours Reduction Are workers in modern economies working “too hard” – would they be better off if an equilibrium with fewer work hours were achieved? We examine changes in life satisfaction of Japanese and Koreans over a period when hours of work were cut exogenously because employers suddenly faced an overtime penalty that had become effective with fewer weekly hours per worker. Using repeated cross sections we show that life satisfaction in both countries may have increased relatively among those workers most likely to have been affected by the legislation. The same finding is produced using Korean longitudinal data. In a household model estimated over the Korean cross-section data we find some weak evidence that a reduction in the husband’s work hours increased his wife’s well-being. Overall these results are consistent with the claim that legislated reductions in work hours can increase workers’ happiness. JEL Classification: J22, J23, J28
منابع مشابه
The Role of Labor Unions in Creating Working Conditions That Promote Public Health.
We sought to portray how collective bargaining contracts promote public health, beyond their known effect on individual, family, and community well-being. In November 2014, we created an abstraction tool to identify health-related elements in 16 union contracts from industries in the Pacific Northwest. After enumerating the contract-protected benefits and working conditions, we interviewed unio...
متن کاملRetiring Cold Turkey
This paper documents “sharp retirement”—retirement accompanied by a discontinuous decline in labor supply—across three data sets, which previous literature found difficult to explain. I propose and estimate a life-cycle labor supply model with habit persistence wherein sharp retirement can be explained by workers quitting “cold turkey.” In much the same way that one might quit smoking, workers ...
متن کاملEssays on European Labor Markets by Filipa
Chapter 1 examines whether immigrants gain a comparative advantage relative to natives in highly protected labor markets. This may be the case if immigrants, being new to the country, are less aware of employment protection regulations and less likely to claim their rights. I test this hypothesis drawing on evidence for the EU and on two natural experiments for Spain and Italy. The results sugg...
متن کاملPrice Floors and Employer Preferences: Evidence from aMinimumWage Experiment
Firms posting job openings in an online labor market were randomly assigned minimum hourly wages. When facing a minimumwage, fewer firms made a hire, but those workers they did hire were paid a higher wage. However, the reduction in hiring was not large, even at the highest minimum wage imposed. In contrast, minimumwages substantially reduced hours-worked, across cells. Firms facing a higher mi...
متن کاملThe Political Economy of State Regulation: The Case of the English Factory Acts
This paper proposes a theory of why the state enacted social policy that regulated the length of the working day in 19th century industrial England. This paper will argue that, far from being capable of self-regulation, the capitalist labor market during Britain’s industrial revolution is best conceptualized as consisting of two major social coordination problems resulting from conflicting inte...
متن کامل